Romania and Ukraine moved on 12 March 2026 to formalise a new strategic partnership in Bucharest, signalling a more structured, long-term alignment on security, defence-industry cooperation, energy connectivity, and minority rights.

The documents signed in the Romanian capital by President Nicușor Dan and the President of Ukraine go beyond symbolic political support. They establish an institutional framework designed to anchor bilateral coordination at the highest level, with direct implications for regional security policy, Black Sea stability and cross-border infrastructure.

At the centre of the package is a joint declaration that elevates the bilateral relationship to a strategic partnership and establishes a more permanent architecture for coordination. The framework includes a high-level strategic commission led by the two presidents, annual joint meetings between the two governments and regular consultations between foreign and defence ministers.

Romania’s message on security and regional order

Politically, the message is unambiguous. Romania reaffirmed its support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and reiterated its rejection of Russian claims to spheres of influence in the region. Bucharest also reconfirmed its backing for Ukraine’s European path and its long-term NATO aspirations, once the relevant conditions are met.

For Romania, the significance of the agreement lies not only in solidarity with a neighbouring state at war, but also in the consolidation of its own role as a frontline strategic actor on the eastern flank. For Ukraine, the partnership adds institutional depth to a relationship that has become increasingly important in logistics, security coordination, energy resilience and access to European structures.

Defence cooperation moves from support to industrial capacity

One of the most consequential elements of the visit was the defence industry component. The two sides signed a declaration of intent that opens the way for joint production of defensive equipment in Romania, with Ukrainian-origin technologies expected to play a central role in the first phase. Drone-related manufacturing is among the first priorities under discussion.

This matters for more than bilateral procurement. If implemented at scale, the arrangement could contribute to developing a more resilient defence-industrial ecosystem in the Black Sea region, while also strengthening Europe’s broader push for strategic autonomy and local manufacturing capacity. The project may receive partial financial support through the EU’s SAFE instrument, with figures of up to €200 million mentioned in connection with the initiative.

Although the declaration itself is not legally binding, it sets a clear political direction and lays the groundwork for future contracts, industrial agreements, and government-supported production structures. In practical terms, Romania positions itself not only as a transit and support state, but as a host for strategic defence production tied directly to the war-driven transformation of Eastern Europe’s security economy.

Energy links gain strategic weight

Energy was another major pillar of the discussions. The two countries agreed to advance electricity interconnection projects, including new 400 kV and 110 kV lines between Suceava and Chernivtsi, and between Siret and Porubne. These links are intended to deepen electricity trade and strengthen Ukraine’s integration into the European energy system through ENTSO-E.

The talks also included the Vertical Gas Corridor and the possibility of using Ukrainian storage infrastructure for Romanian gas, including future volumes associated with Neptun Deep. This is strategically relevant for both states. Romania is seeking to strengthen its position as an energy actor in the region, while Ukraine remains a critical hub for infrastructure despite the war. In that sense, the partnership is not only defensive, but also economic and infrastructural.

Border infrastructure and trade facilitation

Border and transport connectivity also featured prominently. The two governments committed to expanding crossing points, improving rail links and simplifying customs procedures. These steps are intended to facilitate trade, logistics and regional mobility, while also making bilateral coordination more functional under wartime and post-war conditions.

The package also reflects a practical understanding that strategic partnerships are sustained not only by declarations, but by infrastructure, customs efficiency and transport capacity. For Romania, this raises the prospect of a more central role in the movement of goods, energy and strategic resources between Ukraine and the wider European market.

Minority rights return to the centre of the agenda

An especially sensitive dimension of the package concerns minority rights. The agreements include commitments regarding the protection of the Romanian minority in Ukraine and the Ukrainian minority in Romania, with references to education in the mother tongue, cultural identity and the removal of artificial distinctions between Romanian and the so-called Moldovan language.

For Bucharest, this chapter is politically important both domestically and diplomatically. Minority rights have long been a sensitive point in Romanian-Ukrainian relations, and their inclusion in a strategic package suggests an effort to stabilise a historically difficult file while preventing it from becoming a recurring obstacle in bilateral cooperation.

Why the Bucharest meeting matters

The broader significance of the Bucharest documents is that they transform a reactive relationship into a more structured strategic one. Romania and Ukraine are no longer engaging only through crisis management, ad hoc support or diplomatic coordination. They are building a framework of interdependence across defence, energy, infrastructure and governance.

For Romanian policymakers, business actors and regional observers, this matters because it places Romania more firmly inside the long-term reconfiguration of Eastern Europe. The country is not only supporting Ukraine politically. It is also embedding itself in the security, industrial and infrastructural architecture that will shape the region well beyond the current phase of the war.

In that sense, the Bucharest visit was not merely a diplomatic event. It was a signal that Romania intends to convert proximity to war into strategic relevance.

A new phase in bilateral relations

Romania and Ukraine moved on 12 March 2026 to formalise a new strategic partnership in Bucharest, signalling a more structured, long-term alignment on security, defence-industry cooperation, energy connectivity, and minority rights.

The documents signed in the Romanian capital by President Nicușor Dan and the President of Ukraine go beyond symbolic political support. They establish an institutional framework designed to anchor bilateral coordination at the highest level, with direct implications for regional security policy, Black Sea stability and cross-border infrastructure.

At the centre of the package is a joint declaration that elevates the bilateral relationship to a strategic partnership and establishes a more permanent architecture for coordination. The framework includes a high-level strategic commission led by the two presidents, annual joint meetings between the two governments and regular consultations between foreign and defence ministers.

Romania’s message on security and regional order

Politically, the message is unambiguous. Romania reaffirmed its support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and reiterated its rejection of Russian claims to spheres of influence in the region. Bucharest also reconfirmed its backing for Ukraine’s European path and its long-term NATO aspirations, once the relevant conditions are met.

For Romania, the significance of the agreement lies not only in solidarity with a neighbouring state at war, but also in the consolidation of its own role as a frontline strategic actor on the eastern flank. For Ukraine, the partnership adds institutional depth to a relationship that has become increasingly important in logistics, security coordination, energy resilience and access to European structures.

Defence cooperation moves from support to industrial capacity

One of the most consequential elements of the visit was the defence industry component. The two sides signed a declaration of intent that opens the way for joint production of defensive equipment in Romania, with Ukrainian-origin technologies expected to play a central role in the first phase. Drone-related manufacturing is among the first priorities under discussion.

This matters for more than bilateral procurement. If implemented at scale, the arrangement could contribute to developing a more resilient defence-industrial ecosystem in the Black Sea region, while also strengthening Europe’s broader push for strategic autonomy and local manufacturing capacity. The project may receive partial financial support through the EU’s SAFE instrument, with figures of up to €200 million mentioned in connection with the initiative.

Although the declaration itself is not legally binding, it sets a clear political direction and lays the groundwork for future contracts, industrial agreements, and government-supported production structures. In practical terms, Romania positions itself not only as a transit and support state, but as a host for strategic defence production tied directly to the war-driven transformation of Eastern Europe’s security economy.

Energy links gain strategic weight

Energy was another major pillar of the discussions. The two countries agreed to advance electricity interconnection projects, including new 400 kV and 110 kV lines between Suceava and Chernivtsi, and between Siret and Porubne. These links are intended to deepen electricity trade and strengthen Ukraine’s integration into the European energy system through ENTSO-E.

The talks also included the Vertical Gas Corridor and the possibility of using Ukrainian storage infrastructure for Romanian gas, including future volumes associated with Neptun Deep. This is strategically relevant for both states. Romania is seeking to strengthen its position as an energy actor in the region, while Ukraine remains a critical hub for infrastructure despite the war. In that sense, the partnership is not only defensive, but also economic and infrastructural.

Border infrastructure and trade facilitation

Border and transport connectivity also featured prominently. The two governments committed to expanding crossing points, improving rail links and simplifying customs procedures. These steps are intended to facilitate trade, logistics and regional mobility, while also making bilateral coordination more functional under wartime and post-war conditions.

The package also reflects a practical understanding that strategic partnerships are sustained not only by declarations, but by infrastructure, customs efficiency and transport capacity. For Romania, this raises the prospect of a more central role in the movement of goods, energy and strategic resources between Ukraine and the wider European market.

Minority rights return to the centre of the agenda

An especially sensitive dimension of the package concerns minority rights. The agreements include commitments regarding the protection of the Romanian minority in Ukraine and the Ukrainian minority in Romania, with references to education in the mother tongue, cultural identity and the removal of artificial distinctions between Romanian and the so-called Moldovan language.

For Bucharest, this chapter is politically important both domestically and diplomatically. Minority rights have long been a sensitive point in Romanian-Ukrainian relations, and their inclusion in a strategic package suggests an effort to stabilise a historically difficult file while preventing it from becoming a recurring obstacle in bilateral cooperation.

Why the Bucharest meeting matters

The broader significance of the Bucharest documents is that they transform a reactive relationship into a more structured strategic one. Romania and Ukraine are no longer engaging only through crisis management, ad hoc support or diplomatic coordination. They are building a framework of interdependence across defence, energy, infrastructure and governance.

For Romanian policymakers, business actors and regional observers, this matters because it places Romania more firmly inside the long-term reconfiguration of Eastern Europe. The country is not only supporting Ukraine politically. It is also embedding itself in the security, industrial and infrastructural architecture that will shape the region well beyond the current phase of the war.

In that sense, the Bucharest visit was not merely a diplomatic event. It was a signal that Romania intends to convert proximity to war into strategic relevance.

Articolul Romania and Ukraine Formalise Strategic Partnership in Bucharest apare prima dată în LobbyRomania.

The timing could not be more delicate. Barely weeks after the United States announced a partial troop withdrawal from Mihail Kogălniceanu Air Base, the Romanian government has turned to one of its most outspoken anti-Trump voices to represent its new direction. On paper, this seems like a reaffirmation of transatlantic loyalty. In practice, it risks deepening the perception that Romania confuses political symbolism with strategic substance.

The Anti-Trump Identity as Political Armour

Oana Gheorghiu’s career has been built on civic activism and reformist rhetoric. Her open criticism of MAGA-style populism, once seen as fringe, has now become a badge of legitimacy for Bucharest’s elite. Within the government of Prime Minister Ilie Bolojan, Gheorghiu embodies a deliberate attempt to brand Romania as the anti-populist, pro-rule-of-law outpost of Eastern Europe.

But this political posture comes with risk. While her nomination appeals to Western liberal audiences, it also underscores the growing performative nature of Romanian governance, where the vocabulary of reform is embraced for international approval while domestic institutions stagnate.

The irony is striking: Gheorghiu’s rise is less the result of reform than of the collapse of Romania’s traditional political alternatives. With the opposition fragmented and public confidence drained by the cancellation of last year’s presidential elections, the ruling coalition needed a moral symbol, not necessarily a strategist. Gheorghiu offered both a cause and a face.

The Washington Connection and Disconnection

Her appointment came just as Washington confirmed that U.S. forces in Romania would drop from 1,700 to around 1,000, a decision reflecting a loss of operational trust rather than a loss of interest. The Biden-Trump transition of military focus toward Poland and the Indo-Pacific had already begun; Romania’s instability only made the choice easier.

Now, the optics are problematic. While Bucharest celebrates its “anti-Trump” Vice PM, Washington under President Trump’s second administration is recalibrating alliances in hard, pragmatic terms. Within this reality, moral signalling carries little diplomatic weight.

By appointing an official whose name has become synonymous with resistance to Trumpism, Romania may have won applause from NGOs and editorial boards, but lost quiet influence in the rooms where policy is actually made.

Between Conviction and Convenience

It would be unfair to reduce Gheorghiu’s appointment to pure opportunism. Her record of civic involvement and advocacy for hospital reform and transparency is genuine. Yet the broader context cannot be ignored. This government needed to look “pro-Western” again after the chaos of the cancelled elections and Romania’s steady decline in credibility among its partners.

Thus, Gheorghiu’s rise functions as a symbolic insurance policy, a way for Bolojan’s cabinet to rebrand itself as reformist without confronting the structural issues that have alienated both voters and allies: corruption fatigue, bureaucratic paralysis, and an increasingly theatrical political discourse.

Europe Applauds, Washington Watches

In Brussels, the appointment has been quietly welcomed. It fits the EU’s preferred narrative of Romania returning to its progressive track, distancing itself from nationalist rhetoric. Yet even among European diplomats, there’s scepticism about the country’s ability to translate gestures into governance.

In Washington, the tone is cooler. The administration may appreciate Gheorghiu’s stance, but the timing is awkward. Anti-Trump positioning as a political brand plays poorly with the current U.S. leadership. Romania’s government, by overplaying its ideological loyalty to “democratic values,” risks appearing tone-deaf to the geopolitical pragmatism that now defines U.S. foreign policy.

Romania’s Perpetual Search for Validation

The deeper issue is not Gheorghiu herself; it is Romania’s political reflex to seek legitimacy through external approval. Whether from Washington, Brussels, or NGOs, the pattern is consistent: substitute internal credibility with external validation.

Gheorghiu’s appointment fits perfectly into that pattern. It tells allies what they want to hear, but says little about what Romania intends to do. The country’s defence posture remains underfunded, its institutions underperforming, and its strategic narrative reactive rather than visionary.

Conclusion: Symbolism Without Strategy

Oana Gheorghiu’s promotion may mark a moral triumph for reformists, but it exposes the intellectual exhaustion of Romania’s political class. When symbolism becomes the only strategy left, even the most principled figures risk being used as props in a performance meant for foreign audiences.

Romania doesn’t need another symbol; it needs a direction. Until that changes, the vice-premiership of Oana Gheorghiu will remain exactly what it appears to be, a headline of hope masking a government without a plan.

Articolul Anti-Trump Official Appointment as Vice Prime Minister: Romania’s Symbolic Rebellion for Troop Withdrawal or Strategic Misstep? apare prima dată în LobbyRomania.

The data reveals the depth of public disillusionment: an overwhelming 82% of Romanians state they have no confidence in politicians. This scepticism extends to key executive bodies, with confidence in the sitting government plunging to a mere 6%. Such extreme political alienation makes the implementation of sound policy, necessary for sustained development, nearly impossible.

The Vicious Cycle of Distrust

Good Governance is built upon fundamental pillars: Transparency, Accountability, Effectiveness, and Responsiveness. When public trust collapses to 3%, the mechanism of effective governing breaks down across every one of these axes:

Sabotaging Accountability and Transparency

In a climate of profound distrust, the public operates on a default assumption that political action is driven by self-interest and corruption, not public service. When this cynicism becomes the national norm, genuine efforts towards accountability are dismissed as superficial or performative.

• Policy Resistance: Any long-term strategic plan—be it fiscal consolidation, administrative reform, or energy transition—is instantly viewed through a lens of suspicion. A government is unable to implement necessary, but initially unpopular, reforms because it lacks the public mandate (trust) required to ask citizens to accept short-term costs for future benefits.
• Corruption Normalisation: With over four-fifths of the population expressing complete non-confidence, the fight against corruption loses its popular resonance. For many citizens, corruption is no longer an anomaly to be eradicated, but an inherent, expected feature of the political system.

Undermining Effectiveness and Compliance

The lack of trust directly impacts the state’s ability to govern efficiently, turning administrative challenges into political obstacles.

• Erosion of Tax Compliance: Good governance requires citizens to respect the rule of law and willingly comply with state regulations, notably tax obligations. When the public perceives that their money is funnelled to an untrustworthy elite, they are far less likely to cooperate. The 3% trust level is inherently linked to high rates of tax evasion and reluctance to comply, starving the state of the resources needed to deliver quality public services.
• Instability and Populism: This systemic failure creates fertile ground for anti-establishment, populist, and radical movements. These factions capitalise on the public’s anger, offering simplistic, short-term solutions that further destabilise the political environment and discourage the complex, long-term policy-making essential for Good Governance.

The Imperative for a Good Governance Overhaul

The 3% trust rating is not a call for better PR; it is a demand for transformation. To survive this crisis of legitimacy, the political class must fundamentally reorient itself toward measurable Good Governance principles:

• Results-Driven Mandate: The focus must shift from political maneuvering to delivering tangible results in public services—modernizing healthcare, improving infrastructure, and streamlining bureaucracy. Visible competence is the only currency that can begin to repurchase public faith.
• Uncompromising Integrity: Political parties must take decisive, public action against corruption within their ranks, demonstrating that they place institutional integrity above party loyalty.
• Structured Dialogue: Governance must become genuinely responsive. This means establishing effective mechanisms for citizen and stakeholder consultation, moving past superficial debates, and ensuring that public feedback fundamentally shapes legislative output.

The extreme lack of faith reflected in this poll signals that the old political operating model is obsolete. For Romania to secure its democratic stability and fulfil its economic potential, the political class must acknowledge the 3% as its final warning and embark on a sincere, radical path toward transparent and accountable Good Governance.

Articolul The 3% Mandate: Romania’s Lack of Trust in Political Class Paralyzes Good Governance apare prima dată în LobbyRomania.

Unprecedented Opportunities Await

By joining the Schengen Area, Romania unlocks many economic and social advantages. Eliminating internal border controls fosters seamless movement of goods, services, and people across the region. This, in turn, stimulates trade, tourism, and investment, propelling Romania’s economic engine to new heights.

Enhanced Security for All

Membership in Schengen doesn’t just signify economic benefits; it also strengthens regional security. Romania brings its expertise and unwavering commitment to the table, contributing actively to a more robust and unified European security architecture.

A Testament to Romanian Excellence

This momentous achievement is a testament to Romanian authorities’ unwavering dedication and professionalism. Their tireless efforts in bolstering border security, the rule of law, and law enforcement have been instrumental in securing Romania’s rightful place within the Schengen zone.

A Brighter Future for Europe

Romania’s full integration into Schengen is a victory for our nation and all of Europe. It reaffirms the unwavering strength of European unity and collaboration, paving the way for a more prosperous and secure future for the entire continent.

Join Us in Celebrating!

Lobby Romania invite all Romanians to celebrate this historic occasion. Romania’s full membership in Schengen signifies a new chapter for our nation – a chapter brimming with opportunity, progress, and a prosperous future for all.

Articolul Romania: A Full-Fledged Member of the Schengen Area apare prima dată în LobbyRomania.

Why Details Matter in Diplomacy

Diplomacy is all about respect, attention to detail, and understanding the subtle nuances that define each culture and country. When a leader misnames a neighbouring country’s capital, it can come across as uninformed or dismissive. This perception is susceptible to Romania and Hungary, two countries with close geographical ties and shared economic interests but also a complicated past. Even a tiny error can set off ripples, impacting how citizens, politicians, and businesses view their cross-border relationships.

Setting the Tone: Why Leaders Must Lead by Example

As the public face of their nation, leaders are responsible for representing their country with accuracy and grace. When a mistake happens at this level, it’s not just about one individual—it reflects on the nation as a whole. President Iohannis’s misstep is a reminder that diplomatic conduct has real consequences. These moments set the tone for how other nations view Romania and how Romanians see themselves in the global community.

How to Avoid Diplomatic Blunders

High-profile figures can—and should—take steps to prevent these mistakes. Leaders like President Iohannis can set a better example by embracing a few key practices:

1. Preparation is Essential: Knowing the facts about the countries involved in a meeting or event shows respect and builds confidence among diplomatic partners. It’s crucial to get these basics right.
2. Sensitivity Training: Leaders benefit from training that gives them a grounding in the culture and norms of the countries they work with, even if it’s just a refresher before a big event.
3. A Detailed Review: Speechwriters and advisors play a crucial role here. Reviewing all the small details, including country names and titles, can prevent embarrassing moments.
4. Owning Mistakes: When a misstep does happen, a prompt apology goes a long way. Acknowledging the error shows humility and respect for those affected.

What This Means for Romanian-Hungarian Relations

Romania and Hungary have a long history together, and while relations have improved, they remain sensitive. Simple diplomatic missteps can stir up old wounds, potentially creating friction in a relationship that’s been carefully managed over the years. For Romania’s leaders, it’s a reminder that fostering trust and respect requires vigilance, especially with neighbours who share complex histories.

Moving Forward: Protecting Romania’s Image on the World Stage

Moments like these underscore the importance of preparation, respect, and a clear commitment to getting the details right. Romania has an opportunity to reaffirm its dedication to thoughtful and respectful diplomacy, ensuring that future interactions reflect a strong, well-prepared, and globally mindful nation.

Articolul Diplomacy Done Right: How Leaders Can Avoid Missteps and Protect International Relations apare prima dată în LobbyRomania.

Misrepresentation of Storm Conditions

Despite producing only light rain and weak winds, the Romanian government’s declaration of Storm Ashley as a cyclone has sparked outrage among citizens and experts alike. Meteorological specialists have pointed out that such a classification was unfounded, as the storm did not exhibit typical cyclone characteristics, such as closed isobars indicating low atmospheric pressure. This discrepancy raises questions about the motivations behind such exaggerated communications, especially when neighboring countries did not report similar conditions.

The Consequences of Misinformation

The implications of this misinformation are profound. By framing a relatively benign weather event as a catastrophic threat, the government risks fostering public panic and skepticism. Citizens may begin to disregard future warnings if they perceive them as exaggerated or manipulative. As one expert noted, “To consider these normal torrential rains as ‘the storm of the last 20 years’ means meteorology is dead”2. Such statements highlight the potential long-term damage to public trust in meteorological advisories and government communications.

Accountability and Transparency

The lack of accountability for these misleading statements is alarming. The government must be held responsible for its communications, particularly in times of crisis when accurate information is crucial for public safety. Authorities should prioritize transparency and honesty to rebuild trust with citizens. Past experiences have shown that failure to provide clear and accurate information can lead to dire consequences during emergencies.

A Call for Responsible Governance

Moving forward, it is essential for the Romanian government to adopt a more responsible approach to crisis communication. This includes:

• Providing Accurate Information: Authorities must ensure that public advisories reflect actual conditions to avoid unnecessary panic.
• Fostering Public Trust: Transparent communication can help restore confidence in governmental institutions, ensuring that citizens take future warnings seriously.
• Implementing Accountability Measures: Establishing mechanisms to hold officials accountable for misleading communications can prevent similar incidents in the future.

In conclusion, while it is vital for authorities to prepare citizens for potential threats posed by weather events, this must be achieved through honest and transparent communication. Only by doing so can we maintain a well-informed public that responds appropriately during times of crisis. The recent handling of Storm Ashley serves as a critical reminder of the importance of integrity in governmental communication—an integrity that must be restored if we are to face future challenges effectively.

Articolul Restoring Trust: The Need for Honest Communication in the Wake of Storm Ashley apare prima dată în LobbyRomania.

Romania’s President has been missing since December 18, the last day he was publicly seen. Thirty days later, AUR deputy Adrian Axinia went to a police station in Bucharest and filed a formal complaint for the missing person. The case was related to prime-time news by all major TV stations in Romania and all the major news platforms.

Also, the other major Opposition party, the so-called Reformists, USR, posted on Facebook a visual asking for any information about the missing President Johannis.

These complaints are pure political marketing, not else. Romania has four elections in 2024, and the campaigns have just started. However, Johannis is a fake target, as he is in his second presidential term. The real target is the Liberal Political Party – PNL, the now ruling party, and the Socialists. PNL is the party initially supporting Johannis for the presidential elections and his ten-year presidential mandate.

The Opposition exploits citizens’ complaints about their president, among which his notorious missing from office to take long and exotic vacations is only one of them.

Articolul Political marketing stunt: Official Complaint for the Missing of Romania’s President apare prima dată în LobbyRomania.

This success started in 2022 when a joint meeting of the Spanish and Romanian Governments was organized in Spain. At that moment, the Romanian part asked for the Romanians living in Spain to be allowed to have dual citizenship. After that meeting, dual commissions have been established to work on the agenda to fulfil what is now possible.

According to the existing law, the Romanians in Spain who want to get Spanish citizenship must give up their Romanian citizenship. After the two governments sign the agreement, they will get a second citizenship without giving up the Romanian one. Also, they will get jobs, such as in the Spanish Army, administration or police.

So far, this privilege of dual citizenship has been offered only to French and Portuguese nationals, and Romania has become the third country Spain offers this.

More than 1 million Romanians live in Spain, while around 600,000 have residency. Romanians form one of the largest communities of foreigners in Spain.

Articolul Romanian Government Succeeds in Making Dual Citizenship Possible for Romanians in Spain apare prima dată în LobbyRomania.

Anca Dragu has a solid background for this position. As an economist, she was appointed Minister of Finance in Romania between November 2015 and January 2017 during the rule of the Technocrat Government. Also, she was the first woman in Romania to become Speaker of the Senate. Also, she worked as an economist at the National Bank of Romania and an economic analyst with the European Commission and International Monetary Fund.

The interesting political game, noted in a comprehensive analysis of the context by Valahia News, is that the Moldovan Socialists voted along with PAS – Action and Solidarity, the party supporting Moldova’s President Maia Sandu, to oust the former governor from office and instate Anca Dragu.

Beyond any political meaning, this is also a step from what both governments intend to accomplish in the foreseeable future. Both sister countries were part of Great Romania, a territory that covered the Republic of Moldova, the southern part of Ukraine, and partially the northern part of Bulgaria. The two countries still yearn, more or less, to get back together as one, and there are exciting movements from both sides, such as to name, appoint or vote. officials from the sister country, precisely what happened with Anca Dragu.

In this context, one theory circulating in Romania is to have elected as president the current president of Moldova, Maia Sandu. This would be another way of getting the nation back together. And, if you have a passion for history, this is how the Union of the Romanian provinces in 1600 and the one in 1859 were accomplished – by imposing or voting the same ruler in all or at least two of them. So, it would just be history repeating itself.

Also, another theory is to have the two countries back together after Moldova joins the European Union, a process which might take at least 5-10 years to finish. Also, this possibility requires another step: for this political decision to be backed by all or the majority of the European member states. However, this hasn’t happened so far, so it would be the first time two European Union states would do this.

However, we also have to say that there isn’t 100% backing of the Union between the two sister countries, not even within their borders. Only half the Moldovan population would vote for a Union, while in Romania, the percentage is more significant.

Either way, this process seems to have its agenda, and the Romanian and Moldovan politicians follow it. In the long run, Moldova would be a more experienced country at the moment it will join the EU. Moldova could learn much from Romania’s expertise in the field and would be able to play its cards better when the moment comes. Also, a larger country, with 23 million inhabitants, would do better than one with 3 million in a European Union where the economic and voting power matters the most.

Articolul Romanian Voted as Moldova’s National Bank Governor apare prima dată în LobbyRomania.

Bogdan Aurescu obtained 117 votes in the General Assembly, while Gevorgian only 77 votes. This is a historic defeat for Russia, which hoped to have Gevorgian re-elected. It is the first time in the history of the UN International Court of Justice that the Russian representative is not re-elected.

This is seen as a diplomatic win for Romania and all the European Union members who oppose Russia’s aggression.

In the Security Council, Aurescu obtained nine votes.

All the elected judges on Thursday, November 9, are:

• Bogdan Aurescu Romania
• Hilary Charlesworth Australia
• Sarah Cleveland
• Juan Manuel Gómez Robledo Mexico
• Dire Tladi South Africa

Bogdan-Lucian Aurescu was Romania’s Minister of Foreign Affairs between 4 November 2019 and 15 June 2023 and 24 November 2014 and 17 November 2015. A career diplomat (since 1996), he has the diplomatic rank of Ambassador (since 2014). Between 6 May 2016 and 4 November 2019, he was the Presidential Advisor for Foreign Policy of the President of Romania. On 15 June 2023, he was again appointed as Presidential Advisor for Foreign Policy of the President of Romania.

Articolul Romania Wins over Russia and Imposes Judge to UN Court of Justice apare prima dată în LobbyRomania.